An Indian engineering résumé arrives full of terms that carry enormous meaning at home and none abroad: JEE Advanced, JoSAA, branch, CGPA, “2027 batch”. Most US founders skim past all of it and fall back on whether they recognise the institute name — which is exactly the wrong screen, because 180,422 candidates sat JEE Advanced in 2025 for roughly 18,160 IIT seats and the tiers below that are drawn from the same funnel. This is the decoder, followed by the part that actually matters for a remote engineering hire.
Key takeaways
- India has 23 IITs, 31 NITs and 25 IIITs, admitting through a two-stage national exam and a single centralised counselling process.
- CGPA is on a 10-point scale — 8.5/10 is strong. Reading it against a 4.0 scale will mislead you.
- Branch is assigned by rank, not chosen freely, so a strong student may hold a non-CS degree and still be your best engineer.
- None of it beats artefacts: merged pull requests, a deployed project, and a clear PR description settle in twenty minutes what credentials cannot.
The three systems, in one paragraph
The Indian Institutes of Technology (23 of them) sit at the top of public perception and admit through JEE Advanced — a second exam that only top performers in the preliminary round may sit at all. The National Institutes of Technology (31) and the Indian Institutes of Information Technology (25) admit through JEE Main, the preliminary exam itself, and are selective by any international standard. Students rank institute-and-branch combinations in a single national counselling process, and seats are allocated by rank. The practical implication for you: this is one funnel with tiers, not three unrelated credentials, and the distance between two individual students inside any tier is far larger than the distance between the tiers.
The four fields that mislead US readers
Rank. “AIR 4,312” is a national rank, meaningless without the field size — and even with it, a rank measures exam performance at seventeen, not engineering ability at twenty. Note it, do not weight it. CGPA. A 10-point scale; 8.5 is strong, 9+ exceptional, and grading strictness varies by institute and branch, so use it as a floor check rather than a sorting key. Branch. This is the field that costs founders the most good candidates. Branch is allocated by rank within an institute, so a student who wanted computer science may hold a mechanical or electrical degree simply because of where they landed — and many of them have taught themselves to ship software far better than their CS-branch peers. Batch year. “2027 batch” means expected graduation in 2027, so that student is in second or third year now, which is exactly the segment available for part-time remote work.
What to screen on instead
Everything above is context. The screen itself should rest on artefacts, and there is broad agreement on this even in general hiring: reporting on 2026 hiring data notes that 65% of hiring managers say they will hire on skills alone and 76% say self-taught skills and portfolio work can outweigh formal education. In practice that means opening three things — a merged pull request in a project you can inspect, a deployed application with real users, and the candidate’s written PR descriptions or technical writeups. The third is underrated: on a distributed team, written clarity is the delivery mechanism for everything else, which is why it belongs in the screen rather than the interview. India also supplies the volume to make this reliable; GitHub’s Octoverse reports India now has the world’s largest open-source contributor base, so the artefacts genuinely exist.

A twenty-minute screening pass
- Confirm the student is real. Institute email verification plus a GitHub account linked to the same identity. Do this first; everything else is wasted if it fails.
- Open one merged pull request. Not the repository — the PR. Read the diff and the review conversation. You are looking for whether they took feedback well.
- Load the deployed project. If there is a live URL, click it. Does it work? Does anyone use it? A running thing beats a described thing.
- Read 200 words of their writing. A PR description, a README, a blog post. This is your best predictor of async collaboration on a distributed team.
- Note the batch year, ignore the rank. Batch year tells you availability. Rank tells you about a test they took at seventeen.
- Do not filter on branch. Filtering to CS-branch candidates removes some of the strongest self-taught engineers in the pool for a reason unrelated to ability.
- Finish with a paid trial ticket. One real issue, one week, your review standards. The work trial structure covers scoping it so the output is decisive.
Where Tierones fits
This decoder exists because the translation cost is real, and no eleven-person startup should have to absorb it to make one hire. Tierones verifies students at IITs, NITs and IIITs through their institute email, and Tier Rank does the translation permanently — turning commits, reviews and shipped projects into a signal you can read without knowing what JoSAA is or which NIT outranks which. The credential system is not the enemy here; it is simply denominated in a currency you do not hold. Convert it once, then screen the way you would screen anyone: on the work.
FAQ
What is the difference between an IIT, an NIT and an IIIT?
They are three systems of publicly funded institutes: 23 IITs, 31 NITs and 25 IIITs. IITs admit through JEE Advanced, a second-stage exam open only to top performers in the preliminary round; NITs and IIITs admit through JEE Main. All three are selective by international standards, and for a remote engineering hire the differences between two individual students matter far more.
Why do so many Indian résumés list a rank number?
Within India a JEE rank is a widely understood scalar. It is nearly useless to a foreign reader, since a rank means nothing without the size of the field — and it measures exam performance at seventeen, not engineering ability. Note it and move on.
Is CGPA comparable to a US GPA?
Not directly. Indian institutes generally use a 10-point scale, so 8.5/10 is strong and 9+ exceptional; reading it against a 4.0 scale will mislead you. Grading strictness also varies by institute and branch, so treat CGPA as a rough floor check rather than a ranking mechanism.
Hiring remote engineering help this quarter? Tell us what you need — we’ll show you the right 40, not the loudest 4,000.
